[APBeta] Seeing/Transparency

[David Crum]

I too kinda like option B, but like other posters have already said,
it's not that big a deal.  So, either way works :)

On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Hilary Jones<hdjones at pacbell.net> wrote:
> I'll vote for b.  But realistically it's not going to make a big difference
> to me either way.
>
> Hilary
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Rodman" <paul at ilanga.com>
> To: "AstroPlanner Beta Testers" <apbeta at lists.astroplanner.net>
> Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 10:29 AM
> Subject: [APBeta] Seeing/Transparency
>
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> A user has requested that the Seeing/Transparency be per observation*
>> rather than per session, his argument being that those values change  over
>> the period of an observing session. Does anyone else have strong  feelings
>> about this either way?
>>
>> As I see it (sic):
>>
>> a. Per session: less hassle, but not so fine grained. If the seeing  (say)
>> changed from bad to good over the period of the session, it  might not be
>> clear as to why an observation was or wasn't successful.
>>
>> b. Per observation: more hassle (although the default would be to make the
>> value the same as for the last observation in the session).  Session could
>> display range of seeing/transparency based on its  included observations.
>>
>> Paul R.
>>
>> * per resource-combination within an observation might be pushing it.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> APBeta mailing list
>> APBeta at lists.astroplanner.net
>> http://lists.astroplanner.net/listinfo.cgi/apbeta-astroplanner.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> APBeta mailing list
> APBeta at lists.astroplanner.net
> http://lists.astroplanner.net/listinfo.cgi/apbeta-astroplanner.net
>