[APBeta] V2.0a18 gotcha

Paul Kemp paul at bluedahlia.co.nz
Mon Jul 28 15:06:56 PDT 2008


Having digested this....probably individual rather than global.

Paul, if you untick sites in the resources.....the site still show up in the
site selection on the APD main page, next to the Moon info.

Paul Kemp
13.1" f5 Reflector with Argo Navis & Paracorr
Auckland, New Zealand
36° 55' 09" South, 174° 43' 30" East

--- The Southern Sentinel ---
www.southernsentinel.co.nz



On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Paul Rodman <paul at ilanga.com> wrote:

>
> On Jul 28, 2008, at 12:32 , Jeff Young wrote:
>
>  Paul --
>>
>> Actually, I just got back from summer vacation and was ready to get some
>> more V2 testing in.  Is there a way that I can download a17 (I could only
>> find a18 on the alpha page)?
>>
>
> Well, if you're just testing, a18 is safe enough to use, but if you have
> any V2-created plans, they might lose their User Field info, assuming they
> had any defined. I should get a19 out the door soon. Ish.
>
>  I've also switched machines, so this will be a fresh install.  I remember
>> something about the V2-converter assuming V2 files didn't exist yet --
>> should I run it before doing the V2 install, or has all that been fixed up?
>>
>
> You don't need to, if you're just testing. If you want to convert various
> V1 documents to V2, then use it first. All documents are converted to new
> documents, so your V1 installation remains intact.
>
>  No hurry on any of this -- we at 54°N still have another month before
>> darkness returns....
>>
>
> At 47N, we're just starting to see longer nights.
>
> Paul R.
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -- Jeff.
>>
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>> From: apbeta-bounces at lists.astroplanner.net [mailto:
>>> apbeta-bounces at lists.astroplanner.net] On Behalf Of
>>> Paul Rodman
>>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 5:39 PM
>>> To: AstroPlanner Beta Testers
>>> Subject: [APBeta] V2.0a18 gotcha
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I made an unannounced change in V2.0a18 in order to implement a new
>>> feature. Namely, object user field definitions are now global (to all
>>> plans) rather than being local to the current plan. In retrospect, I'm
>>> wondering if that change is a good idea, especially as it will break
>>> user fields in existing (V2) plans. I doubt any of you (except Robin)
>>> are actually using this feature though.
>>>
>>> I am thinking of backing out of that change (which will also affect
>>> other changes made in V2.0a18). It might be a good idea to avoid
>>> V2.0a18 until I have had some time to think about/correct the problem.
>>>
>>> I suspect you're all in "summer" mode, anyway...
>>>
>>> Paul R.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> APBeta mailing list
>>> APBeta at lists.astroplanner.net
>>> http://lists.astroplanner.net/listinfo.cgi/apbeta-astroplanner.net
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> APBeta mailing list
>> APBeta at lists.astroplanner.net
>> http://lists.astroplanner.net/listinfo.cgi/apbeta-astroplanner.net
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> APBeta mailing list
> APBeta at lists.astroplanner.net
> http://lists.astroplanner.net/listinfo.cgi/apbeta-astroplanner.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.astroplanner.net/pipermail/apbeta-astroplanner.net/attachments/20080729/13995beb/attachment-0003.htm>


More information about the APBeta mailing list