[APBeta] To Nebulosity2 users

Paul Rodman paul at ilanga.com
Fri Jan 29 07:02:47 PST 2010


Wouldn't "stringifying" an array of structures be as easy as "stringifying" one in a loop and adding an index?

Paul R.

On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Robin Lauryssen-Mitchell wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> 
> Being able to stringify (<g>) a structure and stash it in the plan doc
> is probably going to make generalising a lot easier.
> 
> Regards
> Robin
> 
> On 26/01/2010 18:27, Paul Rodman wrote:
>> On Jan 23, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Robin Lauryssen-Mitchell wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> I'm slowly making progress with my attempt at automating Nebulosity2
>>> from APv2.  For the first version of NebShoot there will probably be a
>>> fixed number of filters available.  The choices are 3, 4 or 8.  The
>>> difference between 3 and 4 is trivial, but the jump to 8 could be a
>>> headache.   Therefore I think a good compromise is 4.  What do you lot
>>> think?
>>> 
>>> Of course 0 is also an option and my personal favourite :)
>>> 
>> So why is the number a problem? Are you unable to generalise this to an array of filters? Perhaps some minor script framework tweak would help?
>> 
>> Paul R.




More information about the APBeta mailing list