[APBeta] V17 "Fix Date is not persistent (RPEHLM)

[Paul Rodman]

On Jan 31, 2009, at 04:15 PM, RPEHLM wrote:

> Yup, just found it. It's ID is 1666, dated 29Dec2008.
> <http://www.astroplanner.net/reports/details/1600/1666.shtml>
>
> Guess Paul can label this one as reproducible :)

Only if _I_ can reproduce it.

You might've noticed that a day or so ago I introduced a new column in  
the list of outstanding bugs:

< http://www.astroplanner.net/reports/>

The Reproduce column is:

YES if I can reproduce the problem in-house.
NO if I have not been able to reproduce the problem.
UNKNOWN if I either haven't gotten around to reproducing it, or  
haven't yet given up.

The reason for this is to give those who have time an indicator of  
those bugs that are giving me problems. If you are able to reproduce a  
bug that's labelled "NO" and can supply me with more detailed  
directions to try, it has a better chance of turning into a "YES". A  
"YES" means it will get fixed sometime soon.

I've only added this recently, so there are mainly "UNKNOWN" entries.

The Resize stack overflow one is particularly perplexing. I have tried  
every devious technique I know to reproduce this one, without success.  
It's the most heavily reported one too.

Paul R.